The trial of Nicolae and Elena Ceau?escu was a short trial held on 25 December 1989 by an Exceptional Military Tribunal, a drumhead court-martial created at the request of the Council of the National Salvation Front, resulting in the death sentence and execution of former Romanian President and General Secretary of the Romanian Communist Party Nicolae Ceau?escu and his wife, Elena Ceau?escu.
Marked by irregularities that are typical of kangaroo courts and show trials, the main charge was genocide--namely, murdering "over 60,000 people" during the revolution in Timi?oara. Other sources put the death toll between 689 to 1,200. Nevertheless, the charges did not affect the trial, as the verdict had been already decided before the Tribunal had been created; General Victor St?nculescu had brought with him a specially selected team of paratroopers from a crack regiment, handpicked earlier in the morning to act as a firing squad. Before the legal proceedings began, St?nculescu had already selected the spot where the execution would take place--along one side of the wall in the barracks' square.
Nicolae Ceau?escu refused to recognize the Tribunal, arguing its lack of constitutional basis and claiming that the revolutionary authorities were part of a Soviet plot.
Video Trial of Nicolae and Elena Ceau?escu
Arrest
On 22 December, during the Romanian Revolution, Nicolae and Elena Ceau?escu left the Central Committee building in Bucharest by helicopter toward Snagov, from which they left soon after towards Pite?ti. The helicopter pilot claimed to be in danger of anti-aircraft fire, so he landed on the Bucharest-Târgovi?te road, near G?e?ti. They stopped a car driven by a certain Dr. Nicolae Dec?, who took them to V?c?re?ti, after which he informed the local authorities that the Ceau?escus were going toward Târgovi?te. The Ceau?escus took another car and told its driver, Nicolae Petrisor, to drive them to Târgovi?te. During the trip, the Ceau?escus heard news of the revolution on the car radio (by then the revolutionaries had taken control of the state media), causing Ceau?escu to angrily denounce the revolution as a coup d'état. Petrisor took the couple to an agricultural center near Târgovi?te, where the Ceau?escus were locked in an office and were later arrested by soldiers from a local army garrison.
Maps Trial of Nicolae and Elena Ceau?escu
Creation of the tribunal
As the new authorities heard the news of their apprehension from General Andrei Kemenici, the commander of the army unit, they began to discuss what to do with the Ceau?escus. Victor St?nculescu, who was Ceau?escu's last defence minister before going over to the revolution, wanted a quick execution, as did Gelu Voican Voiculescu. Ion Iliescu, Romania's provisional president, supported holding a trial first.
During the evening of 24 December, St?nculescu sent the secret code "recourse to the method" to Kemenici, referring to the execution of the Ceau?escus. A ten-member tribunal was formed to try the case. The members of the panel were all military judges.
Charges
The charges were published in Monitorul Oficial the day after the execution:
- Genocide - over 60,000 victims
- Subversion of state power by organizing armed actions against the people and state power.
- Offense of destruction of public property by destroying and damaging buildings, explosions in cities, etc.
- Undermining the national economy.
- Trying to flee the country using funds of over $1 billion deposited in foreign banks.
Counsel for the defense
The morning of the trial, prominent lawyer Nicu Teodorescu was having Christmas breakfast with his family when he was telephoned by an aide to Iliescu, and asked by the National Salvation Front to be the Ceau?escus' defense counsel. He replied that it "would be an interesting challenge". Teodorescu met the couple for the first time in the Târgovi?te "court room", when he was given ten minutes to consult with his clients. With so little time to prepare any defense, he tried to explain to them that their best hope of avoiding the death sentence was to plead insanity. However, the Ceau?escus brushed away the idea. According to Teodorescu, "When [he] suggested it, Elena in particular said it was an outrageous set-up. They felt deeply insulted. ... They rejected [his] help after that."
Trial
The trial of Nicolae and Elena Ceau?escu was very brief, lasting approximately one hour. Ceau?escu defended himself by arguing that the Tribunal was against the 1965 Constitution of Romania and that only the Great National Assembly had the power to depose him. He argued that it was a coup d'état organized by the Soviets.
Nicolae and Elena Ceau?escu were convicted on all charges and condemned to death in a Stalinist-style trial. At one point, their forcibly-assigned lawyers abandoned their clients' defense and joined with the prosecutor, accusing them of capital crimes instead of defending them. No offer of proof was made for the Ceau?escus' alleged crimes. They were tried based on references, solely by offense-name or hearsay, to criminal acts they had committed in the opinion of prosecutors, or as alleged in press reports. Various irregularities presented themselves, or became apparent post-trial:
- An accusation of genocide was never proved. Four top Ceau?escu aides later admitted complicity in genocide in 1990.
- The Ceau?escus were accused of having US $1 billion in foreign bank accounts. No such accounts have ever been found.
- Nicolae Ceau?escu openly disavowed the court. One of the Ceau?escus' lawyers suggested before the execution that since the pair did not recognize the tribunal, there was no avenue for appealing the verdict.
- The judges' verdict allowed for appealing to a higher court. However, the Ceau?escus were executed around five minutes after the verdict, rendering that provision moot.
- The person who signed the decree for organizing the court, coup leader Ion Iliescu, lacked legal power to do so. The order actually was handwritten in a lavatory in the Romanian Department of Defense.
- Romanian law prohibited carrying out the death sentence less than ten days after a verdict to allow time by the defendant's lawyers to file an appeal. After the Ceau?escus' execution, the death penalty was abolished in Romania.
- The coup leaders said the execution of the Ceau?escus was necessary to stop terrorists from attacking the new political order. However, no terrorists or terrorist cells were found to have been active in Romania.
- Initially Iliescu did not wish to carry out the executions immediately, and he instead favored a formal trial to be carried out several weeks later. General Victor St?nculescu insisted on the couple's hasty execution as an imperative for the Romanian Army supporting the newly created National Salvation Front. After a few hours of debating this option, Iliescu agreed with St?nculescu and signed the decree for organizing the court.
Before the execution, Nicolae Ceau?escu declared, "We could have been shot without having this masquerade!"
Execution
Just after the trial, the Ceau?escus were executed at 4:00 p.m. local time at a military base outside Bucharest on 25 December 1989. The killing was carried out by a firing squad consisting of elite paratroop regiment soldiers: Captain Ionel Boeru, Sergeant-Major Georghin Octavian and Dorin-Marian Cirlan, while reportedly hundreds of others also volunteered. The Ceau?escus' hands were tied by four soldiers before the execution. Before the sentences were carried out, Elena Ceau?escu screamed, "You motherfuckers!" while being led outside and lined up against the wall; at the same time Nicolae Ceau?escu sang The Internationale. The firing squad began shooting as soon as the two were in position against a wall. In 1990, a member of the National Salvation Front reported that 120 bullets were found in the couple's bodies. The firing happened too soon for the film crew covering the events to record it in full; only the last round of shots was filmed. Others believe the shooting recorded in the trial footage was not from the actual execution but was staged afterwards, with soldiers firing a few more rounds into the corpses a second time, just for the camera. This was probably done to give the footage a more dramatic "climax" since the moment of the actual execution was missed by the film crew.
As the dust settled the cameraman, still filming, was seen walking towards the couple's bodies. Elena had fallen to her right while Nicolae had collapsed where he was. A soldier and a medical doctor then began to approach the bodies to confirm that the Ceau?escus had in fact been successfully executed. The cameraman requested that her blood soaked scarf which had fallen across Elena's head be lifted so her face could be clearly filmed. Similarly, while the doctor was confirming Nicolae Ceau?escu's death he was asked to lift up his head for the camera as well.
In 1989, Prime Minister Petre Roman told French television that the execution was carried out quickly due to rumors that loyalists would rescue the couple.
After the execution, the bodies were covered with canvas. The Ceau?escus' corpses were flown to Bucharest and buried five days later in Ghencea Cemetery on 30 December 1989.
The hasty trial and the images of the dead Ceau?escus were videotaped and the footage promptly released in numerous western countries two days after the execution. Later that day, it was also shown on Romanian television. The Ceau?escus were the last people to be executed in Romania before the abolition of capital punishment on 7 January 1990.
Reactions
Valentin Ceau?escu, elder son of the Ceau?escus, argued in 2009 that the revolutionary forces should have killed his parents when they had arrested them on 22 December since they did not need any trial. After making vague comments about the incident, Iliescu stated that it was "quite shameful, but necessary". In a similar vein, St?nculescu told the BBC in 2009 that the trial was "not just, but it was necessary" because the alternative would have been seeing Nicolae lynched on the streets of Bucharest.
Several countries criticized the new rulers of Romania after the execution due to lack of public trial. The United States was the most prominent critic of the trial, stating: "We regret the trial did not take place in an open and public fashion."
Notes
References
- Adam Burakovski (2011). Dictatura lui Nicolae Ceau?escu, 1965-1989 - Geniul Carpa?ilor. Polirom. ISBN 978-973-46-1963-4.
Source of the article : Wikipedia
0 Comments